You may have read some of the headlines about search engines rolling out new tools powered by artificial intelligence.
In one instance, a chat bot was trying to talk a guy into ending his marriage.
In another, the bot began arguing when the user pointed out that the information the bot provided was incorrect.
A well known psychologist recently reported that after uploading a few of his books into a A.I. program, the software was able to write a long article in a matter of seconds, perfectly consistent with his views and opinions but also an original work.
If you google A.I. art, it will bring up images, some of which are fantasy-like or futuristic, others a little disturbing.
Last summer there was big uproar over a piece of A.I. generated art that won the prize for digital art in the Colorado State Fair.
The.. uh.. artist said he typed text into an A.I. program which generated the piece of art.
There is plenty of disagreement in the art world about whether the images created by A.I. are actually art.
Sure it requires imagination to create A.I. art. But whose imagination?
If someone asks me to create a futuristic painting and they describe to me the details they want included in the piece, does that make them the artist or me?
Of course there is going to be a market for A.I. art.
There’s still a market for black velvet paintings of Elvis.
Yes, some of what’s generated by A.I. looks or sounds scary.
But I’m most scared by the lack of human intelligence involved in the use of A.I.
That is, humans who ask A.I. to do things ‘just to see what will happen’.
There have already been reports of users making ‘jail breaks’ (attempting to get around safeguards in A.I. software).
If we truly want A.I. to be a benefit for the world then why not limit it to those who are working to cure degenerative diseases or terminal illness?
Or I don’t know, help bring about world peace?
Do we really need to make it easier for someone to cheat on their college thesis
or do research for us when doing it ourselves will only benefit our brain?
More studies are showing that passive use of media contributes to cognitive decline.
In an age where dementia and Alzheimer’s are on the rise, why are we creating more ways for humans to use less of their brains?
Anything that makes life easier is attractive. But is easier always better?